Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Twitter chats, part 2

ok.... I  found a slower twitter chat: #asiaED  and set up tweetdeck accordingly...

One question a day - that sounds pretty good...
oh boy, here it is...Q1: Why is student engagement so important?

I can answer this one...and there seems to be plenty of time to do so....


and.... yes!   I post!

hmmmm...

and I wait....


An hour passes...and a few ads appear, but that's it....

There must be something in between... I will keep searching. . . .

In search of a twitter chat regarding technology in higher education  .....  a chat that is not at the speed of light  but somewhat faster than a snail. . . . . . .

I will google and continue to look through twitter to see what I can find...even check with some of colleagues elsewhere to see what they might recommend....

stay tuned . . . .

Twitter chats, part 1

I have officially entered the twitter world....kicking and screaming, but I am there. I tweet...occasionally.... but I have mastered the art of lurking.

Several years ago my husband and I ran an online coffee business, so I was very familiar with using twitter for marketing.  In fact, I am the queen of promotions and setting up twitter campaigns....marketing-wise.


Last year I established a twitter account for my program, primarily for recruiting and marketing. Since then I have gradually been adding folks I follow as well as followers. 





I found a hastag that appears to perfectly suit my needs as a higher education  faculty member teaching at a distance (#hiedtech) and checked out a few postings I found there, but they do not seem to have a regularly scheduled chat.

sigh .....   I really hoped to find something less K-12 and more HIED. I  am sure I am not the only HIED faculty member in search of a twitter group...but  . . . .






Last night I tried following a twitter chat at #edtechchat.  I even set up tweetdeck (http://tweetdeck.com) ahead of time to make sure I was ready for whatever was to happen next.


Oh my!

The chat started gracefully and slowly at 8 pm, and  I even introduced myself.

Then the race began....



Once the first question appeared,  bedlam ensued...at least this is how it appeared to me...and  1000+ tweets and 60 minutes later, it was over...

Q1: What do U envision 4 a Makerspace in ur library?

A what? I tried to follow tweets for context clues....and then...ANOTHER Q1 appears! ? Is seems that was a blended chat that night with two groups tweeting as one...

The new Q1 I at least understood: We are talking about giving our students a voice with tch.  what does that mean to you? What does it mean to our students?

Still not understanding Makerspace, I opted to google it (http://makerspace.com/). Makerspaces are "community centers with tools, combining  manufacturing equipment, community, and education to enable community members to design, prototype and create manufactured works that wouldn’t be possible to create with the resources available to individuals working alone."  sounds really interesting, but I'm not sure at this point how that would work for me...but something to file away for the future.

By the time I return to the chat, they're discussing some other topic having nothing to do with Makerspace OR with voice.... then I see an A2...  sheesh...I missed the Q and have to scroll up to find it..    And it went downhill from there.....

I followed, loosely, to see the process...Only one additional person self-identified as being in higher education, and the responses all concerned K-12 application of technology....Assignments and uses sounds interesting, but nothing that seemed applicable... nor did I feel that I could add anything as the users were K-12.

I will keep looking for a HIED-related chat...one that is slower...and see what I find....

  

Friday, September 5, 2014

Is it time to develop technology standards for adult learners?

The National Educational Technology Standards (NETS) are a set of standards published by the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) focused on K-12.  The purpose behind these standards is to level the use of technology in K-12 classrooms, enabling students to learn effectively and live productively in an increasingly digital society.

That's fine for K-12...but what about college students, particularly adults returning to college after several years out of school?   Do they need technology skills to "live productively in an increasingly digital society"? If so, what are those skills?   Do these technology success skills differ for returning adults in undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral programs?

A case in point:

One of my courses required that I consider an instructor  have had in the past or a colleague who I had observed, either face-to-face or online....then rate that instructor according to the ISTE Standards for Teachers.

I am 61, and this has been a difficult assignment for me as it has been 14 years or more since I last took a course, and I have not really done much observation of colleagues.

I finally decided to choose a hybrid class taught by a colleague at another institution, using a combination of satellite broadcast/video-streaming and videoconferencing...

...bring me to ponder the use of technology....and its importance in teaching adult learners...and  the technology adult learners need to be successful in their lives - both home and work.

I LOVE technology. I love experimenting with the software and thinking up ways to integrate it into class. I also enjoy teaching F2F and try to find ways to provide some of the same activities I do F2F for my students at a distance.




In reviewing the ISTE Standards for Teahers I immediately thought about a good friend of mine who has always received excellent student evaluations and comments from former students....and they constantly refer other students to him for courses as well.

This good friend, while able and willing to use Learning Management Systems, video-conferencing, and email, does not really integrate technology into his assignments or into his classroom...despite teaching at a distance.

Does this lack of technology make him a poor or ineffective teacher? Are his students graduating lacking some sort of technology skills needed for success?

Is it possible his use of technology is appropriate for course content and his student population (primarily doctoral students between the ages of 40 and 70 with full-time jobs)?

Does one really have to take full advantage of technology to be an effective teacher?

My friend crafts thoughtful assignments with clear rubrics.

He videoconferences with students as a group 4 times throughout the semester, giving them a choice of 2-3 dates to "attend" each class session.   For those who cannot attend those sessions, he holds individual sessions.

He videoconferences with students individually throughout the semester as questions arise and/or to make sure students are on track.

He provides a one-page reflective writing assignment for each course module.

He posts a non-narrated ppt of the chapter reading in addition to supplemental readings.

He assigns students to groups for oral presentations that are performed "live" through video-conferencing.

He does not post forums, nor does he ask students to create videos or audio posts. Students are, however, required to come to campus for two weeks each summer for an immersion. This Summer Institute provides bonding opportunities and course work requiring students to work collaboratively...perhaps this is enough to keep them bonded throughout the year..... without videos and audios?

Yet, when I rate his course based on the ISTE Standards for Teaching, his courses fall woefully short of meeting these standards... How,, then, do the adult students learn in his classes? Why do they enjoy his classes? Why is it that when I run into his former students at conferences, they "sing his praises". . . despite his not integrating much technology into his courses.

Perhaps the age of the student and student roles outside of class can answer this...

These students are ALL adult learners, all have full-time mid-level management jobs requiring they work at least 40 hours a week. Many already have families although some add to their families while working toward their degrees.

They use cell phones and computers in their work, and often use spreadsheets, documents, and presentation software daily. Those with children may have more exposure to technology just to "keep up" with their children.

The standards proposed by ISTE are still useful for adult learners, but I  question the amount of technology exposure they need to meet those standards.

For example....



According to the first standard for teaching (Standards,2008), effective teachers use  their content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and technology knowledge to "facilitate experiences that advance student learning, creativity, and and innovation in both face-to-face and virtual environments." My colleague does this, using basic technology,  without having his adult learners make videos, record audios, create storyboards, post to discussion forums, and such.

The second standard requires faculty to design and develop digital age learning experiences and assessments. I know he uses LMS-posted quizzes and a tests...and project-based learning, probably more valuable than the quizzes and tests.

In the third standard faculty models digital age work and learning...and this is my what colleague does well. He models the same skills that his students need in their workplaces, helping them to hone those skills, be it decision-making skills, critical thinking skills, research skills, or digital skills.

The fourth standard addresses the importance of promoting and modeling digital citizenship and responsibility. My colleague helps his students explore global societal issues and responsibilities while exhibiting legal and ethical behavior. He uses discussion and reflective writing to do so..... allowing students to ponder the topic then "get it to paper."

The final standard for teachers is to engage in professional growth and leadership.  He encourages his students to present at conferences, co-presenting with them as needed. they present in class using videoconferencing technology.

 Do adult learners in graduate programs need to know how to  perform the same tasks that those in K-12 do? Will K-12 students who enter college and the work world be better prepared to enter these worlds due to their technology preparation?

What are the technology skills necessary to succeed in UG programs? grad programs? doctoral programs?  the work world?

I am not sure that we know the answer at this point. Perhaps it is time to find out. . . . and adjust graduate learning accordingly....




References

International society for Technology in Education. (2008). ISTE Standards: Teachers. http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf